EXPLODES THE ETHICAL QUESTION AND BETWEEN FLI UDC E 'CLASH OF THE WIDOW-BUTTIGLIONE
and the widow (pictured) to reply to Buttiglione:' The differences in our views should not be hidden. We need to talk to all "
Sunday, January 30, 2011 - Gaynews
The ethical question is likely to split the Third Pole on his debut. Always "Achilles heel" of the formation of Casini, Fini and Williams, the question on the "inalienable values" explodes on stage in Todi. On one side there Benedetto Della Vedova claimed that his former radical secularism by ethical issues, the other is Rocco Buttiglione who turns to the Vice-President Members of Fli, saying that "if you plan to use the New Polo as a" Trojan horse "to promote the de-Christianization of Italy has miscalculated."
Della Vedova, operates from the stage at the convention center coalition and make it clear that "the civilian non-negotiable values \u200b\u200bissues for the Church values \u200b\u200bwere always very negotiations." One Response to Casini that the day before had tried to defuse the "bomb ethics." "Casini - says Della Vedova - said that our identity is Christian, but I think we can say we have to talk about the Christian identity of Europe as it is. Why is the Christian world and nowhere else that Homosexuals are not discriminated against. It is in the Christian world where children born out of wedlock have the same rights as those born within. "
Vice President of Members of Fli goes further: "The Church - he said - was against the unification of Italy, is the Church that was against the education of the masses, is the Church that a character like the card. Montini suggested constituents not to support full legal equality. "
words that do not leave indifferent Buttiglione. "Many things that Della Vedova indicated as positive values \u200b\u200bfor me are divisive elements of society." The reference is to the definition of family, individual rights to be granted to gays. These things are discussed in a seminar, not a convention in which all have talked about what unites us rather than what divides us. One thing I want to be clear. We will move from our positions on the non-negotiable values, even if we do not claim to qualify as a training deployed on these positions. Who represents these positions much less to our internal do not think you use the third prong as a Trojan horse to take forward positions respectable but also very questionable. " Seconded the remarks of Donald Mosel Api "avoid excesses. We are all called to build a high synthesis in the Third Pole. "
Della Vedova is to replicate the same again Buttiglione: 'The diversity in our view should not be hidden. We need to talk to everyone. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment